*************
The curious case of Feminism
in a Democratic Court
“Familism: The future is not
just about our daughters. It is also about our sons, and above all, us; the man
and his wife. It is about balance, and not prejudices.”
The election season in a democracy can have a very
disconcerting affect on things that may have nothing to with the political
scene. It can sometimes not really be about the mileage one party can derive or
the other party can lose, but it could also be about creating an emotional
atmosphere inclined in a particular direction, for that could affect the choice
of the unaligned voter; the game changer. But you might ask; what has elections
got to do with this piece of writing? Well, that proves my point! But I’m sure
this is not enough to answer your query. So let me get into the nitty-gritty.
I agree, even if it wasn’t the election season in the
US, Kesha’s case would have received a similar level of attention, and a
similar style of support. That’s how feminism has been working; loud male bashing,
distorted one sided viewpoints, bullying and outshouting those who raise a
valid counterargument, and above all, disconnecting public from reality and
making them assume all kinds of things before they start thinking the same way
as the feminists would want them to. So now that you get the premise of this
writing, let me state what exactly I want to address in this article; the
irreparable and deeply concerning damage this dangerous assault on the
democratic court structure might cause. Self serving agendas have always been
in vogue throughout the history of mankind, and have never been good in the
long run!
No, this piece is not about how Kesha’s case is a
contract case, and how she can very well terminate the contract and pay damages.
Of course, unfortunately for her the damages would run into millions, with Dr.
Luke already claiming an expense of $60 Million in creating the Kesha that
everybody knows and loves today, and add to it, all the money her contract
would generate now that her career has been firmly established. In contract law
Court looks not only at the actual damage sustained, but also the damage that
cannot be mitigated by finding a replacement. Now imagine getting out of a
contract, signing another one that might be a hundred times better, and still
ending up spending the rest of your life working hard to barely pay back the
damages from the original one. No wonder she was seeking a termination from the
court in a way that would let her out as an innocent party not liable to pay
damages. But that is not what this article is about. This article is about the
way Feminism is affecting the democratic nature of both our society as well as
our court system, and about how it is doing nothing but making the society as
bad as the male dominated society only except the order being reversed through
legal means. But the worst is; this will affect democracy in ways that go much
beyond the case of feminism.
Going through social media pages what concerned me the
most was, the court didn’t find any merit in Kesha’s case, but feminists had
already labelled an innocent man rapist. How is this different from the days
when church would label women as witches, or when men would label women as
sluts, without any proof? But that is not the worst part of it. The worst part
is; this labelling can only be justified if everyone was to believe each and
every allegation Kesha had levelled against the man, as absolute truth. What
this means is; the man is a criminal unless he can prove his innocence. And I
am sure this gives you an idea where this writing is headed to from here on.
But let me add that this is not all that is wrong. Even worst; why would one
believe mere allegations to be true unless those allegations are presented as a
generalized scenario that this is what generally happens. The entire case of
Kesha is based on the notion that men generally rape women, and every time a
women calls out a man as a rapist, she has to be believed. Now imagine your
sons growing up in such a world or for that matter if you are a man, finding
yourself at the receiving end of baseless allegations of a woman due to a twist
of fate or a political design.
“Believe all women” is the slogan feminists use to
press their case against men, although there is nothing in the human history or
psychology to suggest such should be the norm. Why not believe all men? Now
before feminists start working their brains and listing reasons to answer my
last question, let me remind them; all your reasons would be based on a
generalization about the entire male population of the world, when they would
actually be based on a handful of men. And before you say that all men are
alike, let me remind you; every woman in this world knows more men than one,
and it might include her own brothers and sons. And if that is not enough to
answer your prejudices, let me remind you of how historically women have not
only been used as honey traps by men, but have themselves willingly hunted men
for their wealth and power; the gold diggers, and the trail of broken homes
that they left behind. There have been known sluts, and I can use this word
without offending every woman, for they all know this is the truth. Now going
by your yardstick if no man can be believed because some are bad, then no woman
should be believed too for some women are bad. Feminists are doing nothing, but
exactly what men used to do in an earlier society. Is this advancement or
return to the old days, albeit on the other side of the coin? While men used to
discipline women through physical dominance, feminists are pushing to do the
reverse through legal dominance.
Now as I already mentioned, the only reason to find
against Dr. Luke in the current case is to believe everything Kesha has stated
against him, not because she has presented any proof, but simply because
feminists want us to accept their assertion; men generally do that. If this is
the best argument to win the case, then imagine all the reasons for which one
could be labelled a criminal without any proof. Today it is about women,
tomorrow it would be about terrorism, day after political dissent. And I guess
you know exactly where we are heading to.
The political powers are already in your telephone,
your mobile, your emails, your messages. You are hooked to television which
shows slick programs produced on mind staggering budgets, not even realizing
they are produced by those who have the big money, and they are not just making
the money back with interest, they are also making sure they have complete
control of the medium you will refer to when elections would come. And that is
not all! You have big corporations like Facebook trying to control your
internet too, through great sounding social gifts like “Free Basics”. There are
paid peer groups motivating discussion on social media sites like Twitter. Now
in such an atmosphere, add a situation where you could be labelled a criminal
by mere allegations levelled against you, and you having to prove your
innocence. Are we really pushing our democracy forward, or pushing it way back
to the time when the crown could get anyone in the public and label them a
criminal unless they could prove otherwise? It is not just male rights; it is
not just the rights of our sons that are at stake over here. The very future of
our democracy is under threat in the light of this mindless assault by women who
are motivated by a single prejudice; all men are bad and all women angels.
The very concept of a democratic justice system is
based on the notion; one is innocent until proved guilty. This is to ensure
that every person would get a fair trial. But feminists have been abusing media
power to create prejudices against men, and alter the democratic justice system
towards a dangerous direction. This directly affects not only the interests of
our sons, but also of our daughters and ourselves, for it erodes the fabric of a
democratic structure, rather than taking it forward in a positive direction.
The feminists claim they want equal rights, but are rather intent on destroying
the same. The future is about finding the balance of interests, of both our
sons and daughters. The future should be viewed from the perspective of a
complete family. Familism is the way forward!
Fatal Urge Carefree Kiss “Amanpreet Singh Rai”
P.S.: On a personal level, I am a man who wants a good
wife. And tomorrow if I have a son, I want a good wife for him too, someone who
can take care of him and his home. I am sure every mother would think the same
for her son too. But feminism is not going to give any of us that. In fact this
post script would have already offended all the feminists out there. So why
should I as a man, support it?
*************
